Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Lucas v. Garland et al
as 1:2023cv00225
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lucas
Defendant:
Merrick B Garland, Peter F. Nerhona, Wing Chau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cortez v. Martin et al
as 1:2022cv00051
Plaintiff:
Adriano Alain Cortez
Defendant:
Daniel W Martin, L Stpierre, Kelly Marcotte and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00050
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00500
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Glennie v. Garland et al
as 1:2021cv00231
Defendant:
Merrick B Garland, Edward Blanchette, Dr. L Bickham and others
Plaintiff:
David Glennie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lucas v. Garland et al
as 1:2021cv00178
Defendant:
Edward Blanchette, Wing Chau, Daniel W. Martin and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lucas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Marte v. Carvajal, et al
as 1:2020cv00265
Respondent:
Michael Carvajal, Central Falls Facility Corporation and Daniel W Martin
Petitioner:
Alberto Marte
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00216
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00215
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Arevalo Carrillo v. United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement et al
as 1:2020cv00192
Respondent:
MATTHEW T ALBENCE, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, U.S Attorney General William Barr and others
Petitioner:
Elmer Alfredo Arevalo Carrillo
Defendant:
Acting Director Todd Lyons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
