Cases filed in Illinois
Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Owens v. Scott et al
as 3:2023cv03320
Plaintiff: James Owens
Defendant: . Scott, . Bradshaw, . Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel Clark v. AFAM Concept, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv13258
Plaintiff: Nekita Daniel Clark
Defendant: AFAM Concept, Inc. d/b/a JF Labs, Inc., Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC f/k/a House of Cheatham, Inc., Dabur International Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hamilton v. Smith et al
as 1:2021cv01318
Petitioner: Charles Hamilton
Respondent: Kimberly Smith and Daniel Clark
Not Classified By Court: Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Allen v. Wexford Health Services et al
as 3:2021cv03106
Defendant: . Eddy, Abdur Nawoor, . Garcia and others
Plaintiff: Robert William Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freeman v. Jefferies et al
as 3:2021cv03006
Defendant: Katy Hackney, Rob Jefferies and Daniel Clarke
Plaintiff: Antonio Freeman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hanks v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2020cv03312
Defendant: Katy Hackney, Rob Jeffreys and Daniel Clarke
Plaintiff: Jay A Hanks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Foust v. Clarke
as 3:2020cv03253
Respondent: Daniel Clarke
Petitioner: David Foust
Not Classified By Court: Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dughetti v. I.D.O.C. et al
as 3:2020cv03222
Plaintiff: Eric Robert Dughetti
Defendant: Rob Jeffries, IDOC and Daniel Clarke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dughetti v. I.D.O.C. et al
as 1:2020cv04860
Plaintiff: Eric Robert Dughetti
Defendant: I.D.O.C., Rob Jeffries and Daniel Clarke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Glucksmann v. Clarke We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv02946
Respondent: Daniel Clarke
Petitioner: Nicolas Glucksmann and Nicholas E. Glucksmann
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?