Cases 21 - 30 of 1,436
Brian Davis, et al v. Lucinda Baier, et al
as 24-5147
Plaintiff:
BRIAN DAVIS, derivatively on behalf of Brookdale Senior Living Inc., ROBERT BAZINET, derivatively on behalf of Brookdale Senior Living Inc. and BRIAN BICKETT, derivatively on behalf of Brookdale Senior Living Inc.
Defendant:
LUCINDA M. BAIER, T. ANDREW SMITH, STEVEN E. SWAIN and others
USA v. Daniel Nieberding
as 24-3130
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DANIEL NIEBERDING
USA v. Bill Combs
as 24-5111
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
BILL DANIEL COMBS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00479
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
United States of America v. Fogazzi et al
as 2:2024mc50035
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Daniel Fogazzi and Manpreet Bhagtana
Petitioner:
NewRez, LLC Doing business as Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing and Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB
Hi-Vac Corporation et al v. Coley et al
as 2:2023cv04184
Plaintiff:
Hi-Vac Corporation and Alliance Industries, Inc.
Defendant:
Daniel J Coley, Matthew D Greenwold, Randy J DePuy and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Morilha v. U.S. Department of Justice
as 3:2023cv01334
Plaintiff:
Daniel Vitor Morilha
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Netcracker Technology Corporation et al v. Carro
as 1:2023cv00826
Plaintiff:
Netcracker Technology Corporation and Netcracker Technology Solutions, LLC
Defendant:
Daniel Carro
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
