Cases 1 - 7 of 7
John Doe #1, et al v. American Federation of Government Employees, et al
as 23-7067
Plaintiff / Appellee:
John Doe #1, and others similarly situated, Annette Wells, and other AFGE members similarly situated, Paul Vaughan and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jocelynn Johnson, Salim Javed, Waqas Kalyar and others
Defendant / Appellee:
American Federation of Government Employees, ("AFGE"), Jeffrey David Cox, Sr., in his official and personal capacity, Everett Kelley, in his official and personal capacity and others
DOE #1 et al v. AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES et al
as 1:2020cv01558
Defendant:
Arnold Scott, Gerald Swanke, George McCubbin and others
Not Classified By Court:
John Doe #1 et al. and John and Jane Does AFGE Officers, Employees and Agents
Plaintiff:
VALYRIA LEWIS, ANNETTE WELLS, WAQAS KALYAR and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754
Unite Here Health v. Paulucci et al
as 2:2013cv01599
Defendant:
Danny Doyle, Harris Law Firm, LLP, Nicholas Paulucci and others
Plaintiff:
Unite Here Health
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Mattingly v. Hamilton County, Ohio et al
as 1:2013cv00515
Plaintiff:
Larry James Mattingly, Jr.
Defendant:
Brad Buchanan, Danny Doyle, James Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fowlkes v. Structual Iron Workers Union 4
as 12-336
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Cole Fowlkes, Union 40
Defendant - Appellee:
Structual Iron Workers Union 40 Administrative, Danny Doyle and Keven O'Rourke
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00319
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fowlkes v. Structual Iron Workers-Union 40 et al
as 1:2011cv05500
Plaintiff:
Cole Fowlkes
Defendant:
Keven O'Rourke, Danny Doyle and Structual Iron Workers Union 40 Administrative
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
