Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Douglas v. The Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society dba Good Smaritan Society Betty Dare et al
as 1:2024cv00505
Plaintiff:
Josephine Douglas
Defendant:
The Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society doing business as Good Samaritan Society Betty Dare and Sanford Health Foundation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00425
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv02766
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Keys v. Faulk, et al
as 17-1144
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAMON DARES KEYS
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES FAULK and CYNTHIA COFFMAN, Attorney General of the State of Colorado
Keys v. Faulk et al
as 1:2016cv01072
Petitioner:
Damon Dares Keys
Respondent:
James Faulk and Cynthia Coffman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dare Investments v. Arent Fox
as 2:2011cv00266
Plaintiff:
Dare Investments
Defendant:
Arent Fox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Asay et al v. Dare to Dream Investments et al
as 2:2008cv00486
Plaintiff:
Marylee Asay, Christopher Teem, Bernece Teem and others
Defendant:
Dare to Dream Investments, Transfrom America Mortgage, Brandon Elizondo and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Keys v. Hartley et al
as 1:2008cv00960
Petitioner:
Damon Dares Keys
Respondent:
Steve Hartley and John Suthers
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Waddoups et al v. Dare to Dream Investments et al
as 1:2007cv00143
Defendant:
Kim Schneider, Lyle Millham, Transform America Mortgage and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Blamires, DMG Holdings, Kyle Dudley and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0077
Dare Investments v. Chicago Title Insurance
as 2:2007cv00404
Plaintiff:
Dare Investments and Dare Investments
Defendant:
Chicago Title Insurance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
