Cases 1 - 10 of 11
BRIDGES v. ADMINISTRATOR, N.J. STATE PRISON et al
as 1:2023cv01594
Petitioner:
DARIUS BRIDGES
Respondent:
ADMINISTRATOR, N.J. STATE PRISON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CARTER v. WARDEN-FDC PHILADELPHIA
as 2:2021cv03286
Petitioner:
DARIUS CARTER
Respondent:
WARDEN-FDC PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Willliams v. Finley
as 1:2021cv00231
Respondent:
Scott Finley
Petitioner:
Darius J. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
JACKSON v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 3:2016cv00345
Petitioner:
DARIUS JACKSON
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and PA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JACKSON v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2015cv04926
Petitioner:
DARIUS JACKSON
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Darius Flewellen v. Superintendent Greene SCI, et al
as 15-1896
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARIUS FLEWELLEN
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT GREENE SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
MURPHY v. NOGAM et al
as 2:2014cv04268
Petitioner:
DARIUS MURPHY
Respondent:
PATRICK NOGAM and JOHN HOFFMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
George v. Kerestes et al
as 3:2014cv00633
Petitioner:
Darius George
Respondent:
John Kerestes, Commonwealth of PA, Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
FLEWELLEN v. FOLINO et al
as 2:2013cv07399
Petitioner:
DARIUS FLEWELLEN
Respondent:
LOUIS FOLINO, SETH WILLIAMS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
George v. Kerestes et al
as 3:2011cv00848
Petitioner:
Darius P. George
Respondent:
John Kerestes, Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania Board Of Probation And Parole and Attorney General of PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
