Cases 11 - 20 of 22
MCDOWELL v. JESSIE et al
as 2:2014cv07311
Plaintiff:
DARIUS DWIGHT MCDOWELL
Defendant:
JESSIE, PHILLIP, VARGAUSE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
George v. Kerestes et al
as 3:2014cv00633
Petitioner:
Darius George
Respondent:
John Kerestes, Commonwealth of PA, Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
FLEWELLEN v. FOLINO et al
as 2:2013cv07399
Petitioner:
DARIUS FLEWELLEN
Respondent:
LOUIS FOLINO, SETH WILLIAMS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TRIPATI v. HALE et al
as 2:2013cv00830
Plaintiff:
ANANT KUMAR TRIPATI
Defendant:
MARK W. HALE, DARIUS HOLMES, DANIEL L. CONN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDREWS et al v. MCFARLAND et al
as 2:2012cv05978
Plaintiff:
DARIUS ANDREWS and KWANELL MACK
Defendant:
NANCY T. MCFARLAND, DONALD J. GRACIA, EDWIN P. CAMIEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IKARD v. SWEENEY et al
as 2:2012cv03709
Plaintiff:
CHARLOTTE IKARD
Defendant:
JOSEPH SWEENEY, ROBERT TURNER, DARIUS GRAZIANI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SPENCE v. THOMPSON et al
as 2:2012cv00857
Plaintiff:
ROBERT RUSSELL SPENCE, JR.
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER THOMPSON, CANDICE THOMPSON, CRYSTAL THOMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBLES v. COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY et al
as 2:2012cv00985
Plaintiff:
BRIAN ROBLES
Defendant:
COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY, PRISON BOARD INSPECTOR, JULIO M. ALGARIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHN v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2011cv03839
Plaintiff:
DARIUS JOHN
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA and JOHN DELANEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
George v. Kerestes et al
as 3:2011cv00848
Petitioner:
Darius P. George
Respondent:
John Kerestes, Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania Board Of Probation And Parole and Attorney General of PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
