Cases 1 - 10 of 10
SAMUELS v. LONGNECKER ET AL
as 1:2022cv00228
Plaintiff:
DARIUS SAMUELS
Defendant:
DR. LONGNECKER, P.A. STROUP and NP KNEISS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBINSON v. DOE et al.
as 3:2021cv00210
Plaintiff:
DARIUS ROBINSON
Defendant:
LIUTENANT JANE DOE, SEGREGATION OFFICER SALYARD, MEDICAL PROVIDER GAUDET, D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Kilby v. Hoover et al
as 3:2020cv01009
Defendant:
Lt. Powell, Reynolds, Simona Flores and others
Petitioner:
Ajarhi Roberts
Plaintiff:
Darius Kilby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROCKMAN v. GATE WAY BRADDOCK HALF WAY HOUSE et al
as 2:2017cv01547
Plaintiff:
DORIAN EDWARD BROCKMAN
Defendant:
GATE WAY BRADDOCK HALF WAY HOUSE, KERRY WHITE and DARIUS LNU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MCDOWELL v. JESSIE et al
as 2:2014cv07311
Plaintiff:
DARIUS DWIGHT MCDOWELL
Defendant:
JESSIE, PHILLIP, VARGAUSE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TRIPATI v. HALE et al
as 2:2013cv00830
Plaintiff:
ANANT KUMAR TRIPATI
Defendant:
MARK W. HALE, DARIUS HOLMES, DANIEL L. CONN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDREWS et al v. MCFARLAND et al
as 2:2012cv05978
Plaintiff:
DARIUS ANDREWS and KWANELL MACK
Defendant:
NANCY T. MCFARLAND, DONALD J. GRACIA, EDWIN P. CAMIEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SPENCE v. THOMPSON et al
as 2:2012cv00857
Plaintiff:
ROBERT RUSSELL SPENCE, JR.
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER THOMPSON, CANDICE THOMPSON, CRYSTAL THOMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBLES v. COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY et al
as 2:2012cv00985
Plaintiff:
BRIAN ROBLES
Defendant:
COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY, PRISON BOARD INSPECTOR, JULIO M. ALGARIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHN v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2011cv03839
Plaintiff:
DARIUS JOHN
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA and JOHN DELANEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
