Cases 1 - 10 of 255
Adams v. Louisiana Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv01672
Plaintiff:
Corey Marquee Adams
Defendant:
Louisiana Department of Corrections, Louisiana State Penitentiary, Tim Hooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dugas v. Smith et al
as 3:2023cv00124
Plaintiff:
Ronald Jermaine Dugas
Defendant:
Carl Smith, Darrel Vannoy, Marcus Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dugas v. Doe et al
as 3:2023cv00126
Plaintiff:
Ronald Jermaine Dugas
Defendant:
John Doe and Darrel Vannoy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dugas v. Turner et al
as 3:2023cv00122
Plaintiff:
Ronald Jermaine Dugas
Defendant:
Damon Turner, Darrel Vannoy, Christopher Harrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dugas v. Orr et al
as 3:2023cv00125
Plaintiff:
Ronald Jermaine Dugas
Defendant:
John Orr, Darrel Vannoy and Christopher Harrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morgan v. LeBlanc
as 3:2023cv00107
Plaintiff:
Edward J. Morgan
Defendant:
James LeBlanc, Raman Singh, Sherwood Poret and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LaVergne v. Vannoy et al
as 3:2022cv00470
Plaintiff:
Brandon S. LaVergne
Defendant:
Darrel Vannoy, Tim Delaney, Joseph LaMartinaire and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Church v. Vannoy et al
as 3:2022cv00426
Petitioner:
Franklin Church
Respondent:
Darrel Vannoy and Jeff Landry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cartwright v. Vannoy
as 3:2022cv00388
Plaintiff:
John Cartwright
Defendant:
Darrel Vannoy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCasland v. Vannoy
as 3:2022cv00331
Petitioner:
Jarret Jean McCasland
Respondent:
Darrel Vannoy and Jeff Landry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
