Cases 1 - 10 of 651
Rosario-Colon v. Vannoy
as 2:2024cv00854
Plaintiff:
Walter Rosario-Colon
Defendant:
Darrel Vannoy
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Vannoy
as 24-30089
Petitioner:
Gregory Lynn Johnson
Respondent:
Darrel Vannoy, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary
Cole v. Vannoy et al
as 2:2023cv01504
Plaintiff:
Terrol Cole
Defendant:
Darrel Vannoy and Louisiana State
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ducote v. Vannoy
as 23-30255
Petitioner / Appellant:
Jeffery Ducote
Respondent / Appellee:
Darrel Vannoy, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary
Coleman v. Hooper
as 23-30176
Petitioner / Appellant:
Robert Glen Coleman
Respondent / Appellee:
Darrel Vannoy, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary and Tim Hooper, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary
Ducote v. Vannoy
as 1:2022cv06052
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Ducote
Defendant:
Darrel Vannoy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Vannoy
as 2:2022cv03186
Plaintiff:
Virgil Smith
Defendant:
Darrel Vannoy
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Demery v. Hooper
as 22-30467
Petitioner / Appellant:
Andre Demery
Respondent / Appellee:
Darrel Vannoy, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary and Tim Hooper, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary
Church v. Vannoy et al
as 3:2022cv00426
Petitioner:
Franklin Church
Respondent:
Darrel Vannoy and Jeff Landry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ross v. Vannoy
as 2:2022cv01652
Plaintiff:
Eric Ross
Defendant:
Darrell Vannoy
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
