Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Thorpe et al v. Cedar Hills City et al
as 2:2023cv00242
Plaintiff:
Janene Thorpe, Sr. Christopher Thorpe, Jr. Christopher Thorpe and others
Defendant:
Cedar Hills City, American Fork City, American Fork City Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson et al v. Bowles et al
as 2:2022cv00573
Plaintiff:
Kent Johnson, Joshua Peterson, Grace Mitchell and others
Defendant:
Bryan Bowles, Cynthia Phillips, Michelle Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hafen v. Nelson
as 2:2022cv00501
Plaintiff:
Jonathan O. Hafen
Defendant:
Darren Nelson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00131
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hope v. Glover et al
as 4:2020cv00082
Defendant:
Darren Coleman, Ted Barnard, Tracey Glover and others
Plaintiff:
Annalisia Hope
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hafen v. Wells et al
as 2:2019cv00921
Plaintiff:
Jonathan O. Hafen
Defendant:
Igor Kovalenko, Adam Wells, Rosalie Wells and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754
Smith v. Lifevantage Corporation et al
as 2:2018cv00621
Defendant:
Ryan Goodwin, Lifevantage Corporation, Justin Rose and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Smith and Michael Ilardo
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Pead v. Ephraim City et al
as 2:2017cv01313
Plaintiff:
Darren Pead
Defendant:
Ephraim City and Brant Hanson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Favela v. United States of America et al
as 2:2017cv00412
Defendant:
United States of America , National Park Service and Department of the Interior
Plaintiff:
Darren Favela
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
Inforzato v. Jensen et al
as 2:2017cv00317
Plaintiff:
Michael Inforzato
Defendant:
Darren Jensen, David S. Manovich, Dave Toole and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
