Cases 1 - 10 of 366
Howard v. State Of New York et al
as 1:2024cv03291
Plaintiff:
Clayton Howard
Defendant:
State Of New York, City of New York, Richmond County District Attorney's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
French v. Montgomery et al
as 9:2024cv00523
Plaintiff:
Darren French and Daren French
Defendant:
J. Montgomery, Sgt. Extrand, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jane Doe 3 v. Indyke et al
as 1:2024cv02192
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe 3
Defendant:
Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Hightower v. The State of New York
as 9:2024cv00367
Petitioner:
Darren Hightower
Respondent:
The State of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lavale Burns v. UP Fintech Holding Limited et al
as 1:2024cv01632
Plaintiff:
Lavale Burns
Petitioner:
Ang Xiangwei Darren, Ryann Jiin Yuan Lai, Christopher L. Dudleck and others
Defendant:
UP Fintech Holding Limited, Tianhua Wu and John Fei Zeng
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01460
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01503
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ed Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Bensky et al v. Indyke et al
as 1:2024cv01204
Plaintiff:
Danielle Bensky and Jane Doe 3
Defendant:
Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00421
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Cossette et al v. County of Oneida et al
as 6:2023cv01587
Plaintiff:
Mary Ellen Cossette, Darren Humble, Donna Marano and others
Defendant:
County of Oneida and Anthony R. Carvelli
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
