Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Devabhaktuni v. Raghavendra Rab et al
as 3:2020cv01741
Defendant:
Porchort Raghavendra Rab, Dasha Barton, Christina Morris and others
Plaintiff:
Manogna Devabhaktuni
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Devabhaktuni v. Rentzel et al
as 3:2020cv00566
Defendant:
Rebecca Rutherford, Maddali Vandana, Kelly Rentzel and others
Plaintiff:
Manogna Devabhaktuni
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Devabhaktuni v. Trumph et al
as 3:2020cv00564
Defendant:
Andrew Messer, Talley Ray Parker, Barbara MG Lynn and others
Plaintiff:
Manogna Devabhaktuni
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Manogna v. Godbey et al
as 3:2020cv00273
Defendant:
Rebecca Rutherford, David C Godbey, Dasha Barton and others
Plaintiff:
Manogna Devabhaktuni
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Devabhaktuni v. Barton et al
as 3:2019cv03061
Defendant:
Dasha Barton, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, The Bridge and others
Plaintiff:
Manogna Devabhaktuni
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Devabhaktuni v. Rutherford et al
as 3:2019cv03062
Defendant:
Rebecca Rutherford, Frisco ISD, David C Godbey and others
Plaintiff:
Manogna Devabhaktuni
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Devabhaktuni v. Godbey et al
as 3:2019cv03039
Defendant:
Dasha Barton, Rebecca Rutherford and David C Godbey
Plaintiff:
Manogna Devabhaktuni
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Devabhaktuni v. Martin et al
as 3:2019cv02846
Defendant:
Medical City of Green Oaks, Denton County Courts, Dasha Barton and others
Plaintiff:
Manogna Devabhaktuni
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Devabhaktuni v. Barton et al
as 3:2019cv02712
Defendant:
Dasha Barton, Heath Jonas, Seay Behavioral Center and others
Plaintiff:
Manogna Devabhaktuni
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Devabhaktuni v. Rutherford et al
as 3:2019cv02225
Defendant:
Ed Kinkeade, Rebecca Rutherford, Dasha Barton and others
Plaintiff:
Manogna Devabhaktuni and Devabhaktuni Manogna
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
