Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 158
Johnson v. Dauzat
as 5:2024cv00536
Plaintiff: Lamont Johnson
Defendant: Michelle Dauzat
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bragg v. Dauzat
as 1:2024cv00433
Plaintiff: Stephan Tyler Bragg
Defendant: Michele Dauzat
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ESTATE OF ETHEL L. DAUZAT et al v. LLT MANAGEMENT LLC et al
as 3:2024cv01514
Defendant: LLT MANAGEMENT LLC, LTL MANAGEMENT LLC, JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC and others
Plaintiff: ESTATE OF ETHEL L. DAUZAT and CARLISS CROWLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Foster v. Dauzat
as 5:2024cv00242
Plaintiff: Jeremy Dewayne Foster
Defendant: Michele Dauzat
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Kelly v. Dauzat
as 5:2024cv00167
Plaintiff: Johnathan T Kelly
Defendant: Michele Dauzat
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bell v. Dauzat
as 24-30067
Petitioner: James A. Bell
Respondent: Michele Dauzat, Warden, David Wade Correctional Center and Michele Dauzat, Warden , David Wade Correctional Center
Pitts v. Dauzat
as 3:2024cv00107
Plaintiff: Kevin Lamar Pitts
Defendant: Michele Dauzat
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cousin v. Dauzat
as 24-30059
Petitioner: Ronnie L. Cousin, also known as Ronnie Lee Cousins
Respondent: Michele Dauzat, Warden and Michele Dauzat, Warden, David Wade Correctional Center
Reed v. Dauzat
as 5:2024cv00021
Plaintiff: Bobby Ray Reed
Defendant: Michele Dauzat
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Cheley v. State of Louisiana et al
as 2:2023cv01721
Plaintiff: Curtis Cheley
Defendant: State of Louisiana, Michele Dauzat and Warden David Wade Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?