Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Hypertherm, Inc. v. Wenzhou Ruixia E-Commerce CO., Ltd
as 1:2021cv00607
Plaintiff:
Hypertherm, Inc.
Defendant:
WENZHOU RUIXIA E-COMMERCE CO., LTD d/b/a JACK & DAVE and Wenzhou Ruixia E-Commerce CO., Ltd doing business as Jack & Dave
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Taylor v. FCI Berlin, Warden
as 1:2021fp00083
Respondent:
FCI Berlin, Warden
Petitioner:
Dave A. Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00607
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Taylor v. FCI Berlin, Warden
as 1:2020fp00183
Petitioner:
Dave Taylor
Respondent:
FCI Berlin, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Amatucci v. Chase et al
as 1:2017cv00419
Plaintiff:
Josephine Amatucci
Defendant:
Stuart Chase, Shane Emerson, Rob Houseman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Huot v. Montana State Department of Child & Family Services et al
as 1:2017fp00314
Defendant:
Cal Boyal, Susanne M. Clague, Susan Day and others
Plaintiff:
Safron Huot
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Amatucci v. Chase et al
as 1:2017cv00237
Plaintiff:
Josephine Amatucci
Defendant:
Stuart Chase, Rob Houseman, Dave Owen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Priestley v. Rockingham County Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2016fp00387
Defendant:
FNU Balluck, Stephen A. Church, Dave Consentino and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew L. Priestley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Amatucci v. O'Brien et al
as 1:2015cv00356
Plaintiff:
Josephine Amatucci
Defendant:
Stuart Chase, Greg Dube, Shane Emerson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Taylor v. FCI Berlin, Warden
as 1:2016fp00153
Respondent:
FCI Berlin, Warden
Petitioner:
Dave Andrae Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
