Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Ekstrom v. Reliable Carriers Incorporated et al
as 1:2023cv02379
Plaintiff:
Christian Ekstrom
Defendant:
Reliable Carriers, Inc., Leroy Davenport and Reliable Carriers Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Aguilera-Valdez v. Davenport et al
as 1:2021cv01209
Defendant:
Cordova Towing LLC, Mario Diaz, Karen Wilson and others
Plaintiff:
Zain Aguilera-Valdez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blea-Davis v. Mental Health Center of Denver
as 1:2019cv03335
Defendant:
Mental Health Center of Denver, Dawn Davenport, John Kickhaefer and others
Plaintiff:
Mercedes Blea-Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tucker Meuse v. Epps-McElroy et al
as 1:2019cv00837
Defendant:
C (I) Lamont Smith, Donald (I) Lefkowits, C Lamont Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Amanda D. Tucker Meuse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00515
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Davenport v. Chapdelaine et al
as 1:2016cv01270
Petitioner:
William Davenport
Respondent:
John Chapdelaine and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Paoloni, et al v. Goldstein, et al
as 1:2001cv00275
Plaintiff:
Dominick Paoloni , Investor Protection Services, Inc. , Nathaniel P. Jarvis and others
Defendant:
Joseph Ieracitano , Blue Paper, Inc. , Gary Hoskie and others
Interested_party:
Larry K. Griffis
Receiver:
Scott A. Elk
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
French v. Davenport et al
as 1:2009cv00244
Plaintiff:
Kent French
Defendant:
Justin Davenport and Nick Adams
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bethel et al v. Pueblo, Colorado, City of et al
as 1:2007cv01309
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Bethel and Tammy Lynn Bethel
Defendant:
Pueblo, Colorado, City of, James (I) W. Billings, Jr., James W. Billings, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
