Cases 41 - 50 of 1,548
Thompson et al v. Deschutes County Sheriff's Office et al
as 6:2023cv01936
Plaintiff:
Ronald R Thompson and Rachel A Thompson
Defendant:
Deschutes County Sheriff's Office, Jonathan Ebner, Aaron Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marroquin et al v. Portland General Electric et al
as 3:2023cv01915
Plaintiff:
Karin Marroquin and Sergio Garcia
Defendant:
Portland General Electric, CFO Joseph Trpik, David F. White and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01899
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
West v. Jacquez
as 3:2023cv01895
Petitioner:
Jay David West
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cline v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 1:2023cv01851
Plaintiff:
David B. Cline
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Jones v. Hinson
as 6:2023cv01797
Plaintiff:
Brittany Jones
Defendant:
David Hinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Wilhite v. Expensify, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv01784
Plaintiff:
Cody Wilhite
Defendant:
Expensify, Inc., David Barrett, Ryan Schaffer and others
McKinsey-Pace v. Tilley et al
as 6:2023cv01775
Plaintiff:
David D. McKinsey-Pace
Defendant:
Jerry Tilley and Michael Siemens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
West v. Jacquez
as 3:2023cv01756
Petitioner:
Jay David West
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Manley v. Bristol et al
as 6:2023cv01680
Plaintiff:
David Boylen Manley
Defendant:
Dr. Thomas L. Bristol, Dr. Michael T. Puerini, Moriam Balogun, NP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
