Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Martin v. Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2021cv00559
Plaintiff:
David Dean Martin, Jr.
Defendant:
Department of Corrections and Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. USA
as 7:2020cv81449
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
David Christopher Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Martin v. USA
as 7:2020cv81424
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
David Christopher Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00010
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Martin v. Berryhill
as 2:2018cv00030
Plaintiff:
David L. Martin
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Martin et al v. Chrysler Group, LLC
as 6:2012cv00060
Defendant:
Chrysler Group, LLC
Plaintiff:
David A. Martin and Mark Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2012cv00058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC v. David N. Martin Revocable Trust et al
as 3:2011cv00060
Plaintiff:
Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC
Defendant:
David N. Martin Revocable Trust and Ann Louise Martin Revocable Trust
Counter_claimant:
Ann Louise Martin Revocable Trust and David N. Martin Revocable Trust
Counter_defendant:
Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martin et al v. Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC
as 3:2010cv00910
Plaintiff:
David N. Martin and Ann Louise Martin
Defendant:
Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Martin v. United States Of America
as 7:2007cv00306
Petitioner:
David Lee Martin
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
