Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03367
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00118
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03809
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Lapp v. Cohen et al
as 1:2022cv00949
Plaintiff:
Katie F. Lapp
Defendant:
David Alan Cohen, Trudy Mintz, Brian Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
WHITFIELD v. KADMON HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv04605
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WHITFIELD
Defendant:
KADMON HOLDINGS, INC., TASOS G KONIDARIS, HARLAN W WAKSAL and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
REINIG et al v. RBS CITIZENS, N.A.
as 2:2015cv01541
Special Master:
DAVID R. COHEN
Plaintiff:
ALEX REINIG, KEN GRITZ, BOB SODA and others
Defendant:
RBS CITIZENS, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01369
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
JOHNSON v. THE TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2014cv04673
Plaintiff:
CARL E. JOHNSON
Defendant:
THE TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA , DAVID L. COHEN , ANDREA MITCHELL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
COHEN et al v. SCHELL GAMES, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv01779
Plaintiff:
DAVID S. COHEN and AMANDA J. REYES
Defendant:
SCHELL GAMES, LLC and CHRISTOPHER F. ARNOLD
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01797
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 158 Bankruptcy Appeal from Judgment/Order
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
