Cases 1 - 10 of 22
James Couture v. David Berkebile, et al
as 21-71341
Petitioner:
JAMES ARTHUR COUTURE
Respondent:
DAVID BERKEBILE and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF MONTANA
Victor Fourstar, Jr., et al v. David Berkebile, et al
as 21-35629
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VICTOR CHARLES FOURSTAR, Jr.
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SR. MITCHELL
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID BERKEBILE, PETER MOLNAR, ANTHONY PERKINS and others
Victor Fourstar, Jr. v. David Berkebile, et al
as 21-35627
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VICTOR CHARLES FOURSTAR, Jr.
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SR. MITCHELL
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID BERKEBILE, PETER MOLNAR, ANTHONY PERKINS and others
Fourstar et al v. Berkebile et al
as 4:2020cv00099
Plaintiff:
Victor Charles Fourstar, Jr. and Robert Mitchell, Sr.
Defendant:
Mary Smitherene, Unknow United States Probation and Parole Officer, Unknown Nurses and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Couture v. David Berkebile, et al
as 17-35906
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR COUTURE
Respondent - Appellee:
DAVID BERKEBILE and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF MONTANA
Canda v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 4:2016cv00044
Plaintiff:
James Edward Canda
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Montana Department of Corrections, David Berkebile and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Berkebile et al
as 4:2015cv00063
Petitioner:
Alan Wayne Williams
Respondent:
David Berkebile and Tim Fox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ayers v. Berkebile et al
as 1:2015cv00065
Petitioner:
Twain Newman Ayers
Respondent:
David Berkebile and Tim Fox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Couture v. Berkebile et al
as 9:2015cv00080
Petitioner:
James Arthur Couture
Respondent:
David Berkebile and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Archer v. Berkebile
as 4:2015cv00051
Petitioner:
Maurice Ronald Archer
Respondent:
David Berkebile
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
