Other Statutes Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 325
Defenders of Wildlife et al v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2021cv00344
Plaintiff: Oregon Wild, Humane Society of the United States, Sierra Club and others
Defendant: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and David Bernhardt, U.S. Secretary of the Interior
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
WildEarth Guardians et al v. David Bernhardt, U.S. Secretary of the Interior et al
as 4:2021cv00349
Plaintiff: Klamath Siskiyou Wildlands Center, Cascadia Wildlands, The Lands Council and others
Defendant: Aurelia Skipworth, Director United States Fish and Wildlife Service, United States Fish And Wildlife Service, David Bernhardt, U.S. Secretary of the Interior and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538
Safari Club International, et al v. Scott De La Vega, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-35030
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, MITCH ELLIS, in his official capacity as Chief of Refuges for the Alaska Region of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, MARGARET EVERSON, in her official capacity as acting Director of the National Park Service and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: ALASKA WILDLIFE ALLIANCE, DENALI CITIZENS COUNCIL, WILDERNESS WATCH and others
Plaintiff: STATE OF ALASKA
Plaintiff / Appellant: SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY et al v. U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE et al
as 1:2021cv00107
Plaintiff: HEALTHY GULF and CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
Defendant: U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE and DAVID BERNHARDT
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1540
Wildearth Guardians et al v. U.S. Bureau of Land Management et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2021cv00004
Plaintiff: Montana Environmental Information Center, Sierra Club, Wildearth Guardians and others
Defendant: David Bernhardt, Donato Judice and U.S. Bureau of Land Management
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
NAVAJO NATION INDIAN TRIBE v. DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR et al
as 1:2021cv00013
Defendant: DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR, DAVID BERNHARDT, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY and others
Plaintiff: NAVAJO NATION INDIAN TRIBE
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640
Cottonwood Environmental Law C v. Steve Bullock, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-36125
Defendant / Appellee: LEANNE MARTEN, in her official capacity as Regional Forester, U.S. Forest Service, STEVE BULLOCK, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Montana, U.S. FOREST SERVICE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: COTTONWOOD ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER
Steve Bullock, et al v. BLM, et al
as 20-36129
Defendant / Appellant: DAVID BERNHARDT, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Department of the Interior, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND CONSERVATION and STEVE BULLOCK, in his official capacity as Governor of Montana
Hoopa Valley Tribe v. United States Bureau of Reclamation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv01814
Plaintiff: Hoopa Valley Tribe
Defendant: United States Department of Interior, David Bernhardt, United States Bureau of Reclamation and others
Petitioner: Non-Party Westlands Water District, Non-Party Panoche Water District and Non-Party San Luis Water District
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
State of Wyoming, et al v. DOI, et al
as 20-8073
Intervenor: STATE OF CALIFORNIA, EARTHWORKS, STATE OF NEW MEXICO and others
Respondent: WESTERN ORGANIZATION OF RESOURCE COUNCILS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, MICHAEL D. NEDD, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the Bureau of Land Management and others
Intervenor / Appellee: STATE OF TEXAS and STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
Petitioner: STATE OF WYOMING, STATE OF MONTANA, INDEPENDANT PETROLEUM ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?