Cases
West v. Boehm
as 1:2016cv00290
Petitioner: Warren Forrester West
Respondent: David Boehm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sutton-Bey v. Pearson et al
as 1:2015cv00446
Plaintiff: Aaron C. Sutton-Bey
Defendant: Eddie L. Pearson, Carolyn Parker, H. Mays and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boehm et al v. HSBC Bank USA, National Association et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2012cv02930
Plaintiff: David Boehm and Grace Boehm
Defendant: HSBC Bank USA, National Association, EMC Mortgage Services, LLC and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Hankins v. Boehm We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2012cv00297
Defendant: David Boehm
Plaintiff: Ricky Lee Hankins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Farabee v. Clarke et al
as 2:2012cv00176
Plaintiff: Brian Farabee
Defendant: Harold W. Clarke, James W. Stewart, III, David Boehm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Farabee v. Clarke, et al
as 2:2012cv00177
Plaintiff: Brian Farabee
Defendant: Harold W. Clarke, David Boehm, James W. Stewart, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parker v. Boehm
as 1:2011cv01015
Petitioner: Kenya Basil Parker
Respondent: David Boehm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Farabee v. Johnson et al
as 2:2010cv00006
Plaintiff: Brian Farabee
Defendant: Gene Johnson, Commissioner of the Department of Mental Health, Mental Retardation & Substance Abuse Services (DMHMRSAS), Dr. John Bench and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Farabee v. Johnson et al
as 2:2009cv00616
Plaintiff: Brian Farabee
Defendant: Gene Johnson, The Commissioner of the Department of Mental Health, Mental Retardation & Substance Abuse Services (DMHMRSAS), Dr. John Bench and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?