Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Thomas v. Kalamazoo Public Safety et al
as 1:2024cv00396
Plaintiff:
Courtney Thomas
Defendant:
Kalamazoo Public Safety, Jordan Jacob, Eric Zapata and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Thomas v. Kalamazoo Public Safety Department et al
as 1:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Courtney Thomas
Defendant:
Kalamazoo Public Safety Department, Sydney Garner, Mitchell Vorick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Courtney Thomas v. David Boysen, et al
as 23-1960
Plaintiff / Appellant:
COURTNEY THOMAS
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID BOYSEN, Chief of Kalamazoo Dept. of Public Safety, in his official capacity, KALAMAZOO, MI DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, Training Division, UNKNOWN PARTY #1, named as Officer 1 and others
Thomas v. Boysen et al
as 1:2023cv00996
Plaintiff:
Courtney Thomas
Defendant:
David Boysen, Bradley Spieldenner, Kalamazoo Dept. of Public Safety Training Division and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Thomas v. Boysen et al
as 1:2023cv00946
Plaintiff:
Courtney Thomas
Defendant:
David Boysen, Kalamazoo Dept. of Public Safety Training Division, Unknown Party #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Thomas v. Boysen et al
as 1:2023cv00945
Plaintiff:
Courtney Thomas
Defendant:
David Boysen, Kalamazoo Dept. of Public Safety Dept, Tracy Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Handley et al v. Kalamazoo, City of et al
as 1:2017cv00387
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Handley and Becky Handley
Defendant:
Kalamazoo, City of , Lakisha Jones , Steve Seiser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Micklin #10827-040 v. Goodell et al
as 1:2007cv00237
Plaintiff:
Sean Patrick Micklin #10827-040
Defendant:
Sheila Goodell, David Boysen, Keith McGahan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
