Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Browning v. Cardwell et al
as 4:2022cv00074
Plaintiff:
John David Browning
Defendant:
Garland Don Cardwell, J. Kerrye Ashmore and Karla Baugh-Hackett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Burleson et al
as 9:2020cv00005
Defendant:
Mitchell J Butcher, Karla Burleson and Teliesin R Stern
Plaintiff:
David Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Buckley v. Brown et al
as 3:2016cv00077
Plaintiff:
Billy D Buckley
Defendant:
David Brown, M Spencer and Keyonpa Andre Gamble
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perkins v. Chatham et al
as 3:2012cv03651
Plaintiff:
Troy Lee Perkins
Defendant:
Andy Chatham, Dallas Co. Public Defenders Office, Craig Watkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perkins v. Chatham et al
as 6:2012cv00219
Defendant:
Chief of Police David Brown, Judge Andy Chatham, Dallas Co. Public Defenders Office and others
Plaintiff:
Troy Lee Perkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Glaspie v. Valdez et al
as 3:2011cv01113
Plaintiff:
Kevin Neal Glaspie
Defendant:
Lupe Valdez and David Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oliver v. Brown et al
as 3:2010cv02154
Plaintiff:
Norman Charles Oliver
Defendant:
David Brown, Corporal Dallas Police Department and Dallas Police Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oliver v. Brown et al
as 4:2010cv03848
Plaintiff:
Norman Charles Oliver
Defendant:
David Brown, Corporal Dallas Police Department and Dallas Police Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Director TDCJ-ID
as 9:2009cv00185
Petitioner:
Charles David Brown
Respondent:
Director TDCJ-ID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. English et al
as 9:2009cv00114
Plaintiff:
Charles David Brown
Defendant:
H English, G Oliver and Linda Richey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
