Cases
Cases 31 - 34 of 34
Planned Parenthood Federation, et al v. Center for Medical Progress, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-16997
Plaintiff - Appellee: PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA, INC., PLANNED PARENTHOOD: SHASTA-DIABLO, INC., DBA Planned Parenthood Northern California, PLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE, INC. and others
Defendant - Appellant: CENTER FOR MEDICAL PROGRESS, BIOMAX PROCUREMENT SERVICES, LLC, DAVID DALEIDEN, AKA Robert Daoud Sarkis and others
Defendant: TROY NEWMAN and PHILLIP S. CRONIN
Defendant - Appellee: ALBIN RHOMBERG
Jane Does 1-10 et al v. University of Washington et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv01212
Plaintiff: Jane Does 1-10 and John Does 1-10
Defendant: University of Washington, David Daleiden, Zachary Freeman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc. et al v. Center for Medical Progress et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv00236
Plaintiff: Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc, Planned Parenthood Of The Rocky Mountains, Planned Parenthood Center For Choice and others
Defendant: Center for Medical Progress, Gerardo Adrian Lopez, David Daleiden and others
3Rd Party Defendant: Regents of the University of California
Interested Party: Advanced Bioscience Resources, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
National Abortion Federation v. Center for Medical Progress et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv03522
Defendant: Center for Medical Progress, David Daleiden, Troy Newman and others
Undetermined: Steven Cooley, Charles C Johnson and Brentford J. Ferreira
Amicus Curiae: State of Arizona and Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
Plaintiff: National Abortion Federation
3Rd Party Plaintiff: Planned Parenthood Federation of America
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?