Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Stanny Ray Hudgins et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv01747
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Stanny Ray Hudgins, Philip Wendell Gould, Frank Joseph Micalizzi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Bothwell et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv01240
Defendant:
Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc, 3M Company and others
Plaintiff:
Jimmie L Bothwell, Thomas John Bigford, Joseph Frank Bilski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Product Liability
Sutherland v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, Inc., et al
as 6:2021cv00671
Defendant:
Lorillard Tobacco Company, Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation, R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, Inc., and others
Plaintiff:
David Earl Sutherland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Case v. Stephon et al
as 1:2018cv02010
Defendant:
Warden M. Stephon, Ms. Macon, Ms. Robert and others
Plaintiff:
David Earle Case
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Caughman v. Richland County
as 3:2018cv01012
Plaintiff:
David Earl Caughman
Defendant:
Richland County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Moore v. USA
as 6:2016cv00887
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
David Earle Moore, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Watts v. USA
as 4:2012cv03559
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
David Earl Watts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Burgess v. Hall et al
as 9:2011cv02384
Plaintiff:
David Earl Burgess
Defendant:
Jason Hall and Lt B Jefferson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Webb et al v. Aqua-Chem Inc et al
as 8:2009cv01038
Plaintiff:
David Earl Webb and Linda Webb
Defendant:
Aqua-Chem Inc, Borg Warner Morse TEC Inc, Certainteed Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
