Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Clark v. State of Oklahoma, et al
as 24-5044
Plaintiff:
DAVID GEORGE CLARK
Defendant:
STATE OF OKLAHOMA, KEVIN STITT, Governor, OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Director and others
Clark v. State of Oklahoma, et al.
as 4:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
David George Clark
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma, Kevin Stitt, Oklahoma Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. State of Oklahoma
as 4:2023cv00533
Petitioner:
David George Clark
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clark v Crow
as 4:2022cv00334
Defendant:
David George Clark and Scott Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clark v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 4:2022cv00304
Plaintiff:
David George Clark
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma, Oklahoma Department of Corrections, Tulsa County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 4:2022cv00303
Plaintiff:
David George Clark
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma, Oklahoma Department of Corrections and Tulsa County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 4:2022cv00267
Plaintiff:
David George Clark
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma, State County City Officials, et al., Tulsa County Police and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clark v. Oklahoma DOC
as 21-6030
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID GEORGE CLARK
Respondent / Appellee:
OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Clark v. Nunn
as 21-5020
Respondent / Appellee:
SCOTT NUNN
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID GEORGE CLARK
Clark v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections
as 5:2020cv00807
Petitioner:
David George Clark
Respondent:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
