Cases 1 - 10 of 32
HARE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv24379
Plaintiff:
DAVID HARE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HARE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv64041
Plaintiff:
DAVID HARE
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Quick v. Hodge et al
as 2:2016cv00177
Plaintiff:
Rosston Nicholas Quick
Defendant:
Alex Hodge, Robert Little, David Hare and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quick v. Hodge et al
as 2:2016cv00178
Plaintiff:
Rosston Nicholas Quick
Defendant:
Alex Hodge, Robert Little, David Hare and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quick v. Hodge et al
as 2:2016cv00167
Plaintiff:
Rosston Nicholas Quick
Defendant:
Alex Hodge, Robert Little, David Hare and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quick v. Hodge et al
as 2:2016cv00166
Plaintiff:
Rosston Nicholas Quick
Defendant:
Alex Hodge, Robert Little, David Hare and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gregory Hancock v. Alex Hodge, et al
as 16-60467
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY HANCOCK
Defendant - Appellee:
SHERIFF ALEX HODGE, Individual-Official Capacity, CAPTAIN DAVID HARE, Individual-Official Capacity, RANDY JOHNSON and others
Davis v. Hodge et al
as 2:2016cv00074
Plaintiff:
Timothy Eugene Davis
Defendant:
Alex Hodge, Randy Johnson, Robert Little and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yost v Hodge, et al
as 2:2016cv00056
Plaintiff:
Matthew Lavon Yost
Defendant:
Alex Hodge, Randy Johnson, David Hare and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Guillory v. Jones County Jail, et al
as 16-60250
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT P. GUILLORY
Defendant - Appellee:
SHERIFF ALEX HODGE, MAJOR RANDY JOHNSON, CAPTAIN DAVID HARE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
