Cases 1 - 10 of 10
HARRISON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv61497
Plaintiff:
DAVID HARRISON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARRISON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv53449
Plaintiff:
JAMES DAVID HARRISON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARRISON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv93906
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID HARRISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARRISON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv85475
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID HARRISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARRISON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv74431
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID HARRISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARRISON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv04239
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID HARRISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GIBSON v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03245
Plaintiff:
CECIL GILBERT, DARIUS HART, DEVONTE SHEROD HARRIS and others
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, 3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harrison v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv02401
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
David Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bentley v. Harrison et al
as 1:2015cv02950
Plaintiff:
Cindi J. Bentley
Defendant:
David Harrison and Peggy B. Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Broxson v. Turner et al(MAG+)
as 2:2008cv00582
Plaintiff:
Elephenia Thompkins Broxson
Defendant:
Chris Turner and David Harrison
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
