Cases
United States of America v. Ho-Romero
as 23-3848
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: DAVID HO-ROMERO
Orellana v. MMSC Reston, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv00597
Plaintiff: Jairo Carpio Orellana
Defendant: MMSC Reston, LLC and David Ho
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
David Ho v. Ernst & Young, LLP
as 12-17677
Plaintiff - Appellant: DAVID HO, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated and on behalf of the general public
Defendant - Appellee: ERNST & YOUNG, LLP
Michelle Richards, et al v. Ernst & Young, LLP We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-17530
Plaintiff - Appellee: DAVID HO, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated and on behalf of the general public and SARAH FERNANDEZ
Defendant - Appellant: ERNST & YOUNG, LLP
Terrance Bane v. David Ho et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2011cv01541
Plaintiff: Terrance Bane
Defendant: Does and David Ho
David Ho v. Ernst & Young, LLP
as 11-80263
Plaintiff - Respondent: DAVID HO, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated and on behalf of the general public
Defendant - Petitioner: ERNST & YOUNG, LLP
Ho v. Ernst & Young, LLP
as 1:2010cv07130
Defendant: Ernst & Young, LLP
Plaintiff: David Ho
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
David Ho v. Host International, Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv05731
Plaintiff: David Ho and David Ho
Defendant: Host International, Inc. and DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Suns Motorcar Group, et al v. QRS Auto Group Inc, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 07-20353
Plaintiff - Appellee: SUN'S MOTORCAR GROUP LLC and TIELIN SUN
Defendant - Appellant: QRS AUTO GROUP INC, SHAO GUANG HE, also known as David Ho and GUANGZHOU KAISI INVESTMENT CO LTD, also known as Guangzhoushi Kaisi Touzi Youxian Gongsi

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?