Cases 1 - 10 of 51
Lu v. Reyes et al
as 3:2023cv02721
Plaintiff:
Yan-Xu Lu
Defendant:
Sean D Reyes, Kyle J Kaiser, J Clifford Petersen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Diogu et al v. Jones et al
as 2:2023cv00054
Plaintiff:
Diogu Kalu Diogu, II, John Doe and Jane Doe
Defendant:
David Jones, Eduardo V. Rodriguez and T. Michael O'Conner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Violation 5th & 8th Amendme
Diogu et al v. Jones et al
as 4:2023cv03959
Plaintiff:
Diogu Kalu Diogu, II, JOHN DOE and JANE DOE
Defendant:
dft David Jones, Eduardo V. Rodriguez, T. Michael O'Conner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Violation 5th & 8th Amendme
Mitchell v. San Angelo Police Department et al
as 6:2023cv00062
Plaintiff:
Fritzgera Charles Mitchell
Defendant:
San Angelo Police Department, John David Bouligny, Adrian E Hardy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Employers Mutual Casualty Company
as 7:2023cv00097
Plaintiff:
David Jones
Defendant:
Employers Mutual Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Anderson v. Jones
as 4:2023cv01188
Petitioner:
Sonya Chandler Anderson
Respondent:
David Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jones v. Texas Dept. of Criminal Justice et al
as 7:2022cv00007
Plaintiff:
Carl David Jones
Defendant:
Texas Dept. of Criminal Justice, Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID, Brian Collier-TDCJ Executive Director and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Martin et al
as 7:2021cv00035
Defendant:
Lora Stanley, Teri Wilke, Dr. Marcia J. Odal and others
Plaintiff:
Carl David Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. Jones
as 6:2020cv00096
Plaintiff:
David Glenn Evans
Defendant:
David Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. Jones
as 6:2020cv00054
Plaintiff:
David Evans
Defendant:
David Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
