Cases 51 - 60 of 96
Geronimo Sevilla v. David Justice
as 2:2009cv06565
Petitioner:
Geronimo Sevilla
Respondent:
David Justice, Mr. and David Justice, Mr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Bojorquez v. Justice et al
as 1:2009cv00172
Petitioner:
Bernardo Felix Bojorquez
Respondent:
David Justice, Director of BOP, Director of ICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Olmos v. Justice et al
as 1:2009cv00140
Petitioner:
Vicente Olmos
Respondent:
David Justice, U.S. Attorney General, U.S. Government and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Rojas-Garcia v. Justice
as 1:2009cv00128
Petitioner:
Gabriel Rojas-Garcia
Respondent:
David Justice
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Arias v. Justice
as 1:2009cv00119
Petitioner:
Jorge Arias
Respondent:
David Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Rojas-Garcia v. Justice
as 7:2009cv00068
Petitioner:
Gabriel Rojas-Garcia
Respondent:
David Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Baez v. Tamar et al
as 1:2009cv00105
Plaintiff:
Miguel Baez
Defendant:
Kvron Tamar, Joseph Bryan, Glenn Balinao and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arias v. Justice
as 5:2009cv00465
Petitioner:
Jorge Arias
Respondent:
David Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00088
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00087
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
