Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Star v. State of Mississippi
as 2:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
David Lee Star
Defendant:
State of Mississippi
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harbin v. Hines et al
as 4:2023cv00215
Petitioner:
David Lee Harbin
Respondent:
Hon. Ashley Hines and Lynn Fitch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Star v. Doe
as 2:2023cv00157
Plaintiff:
David Lee Star
Defendant:
John Doe
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
K. v. Ocean Springs School District et al
as 1:2022cv00303
Plaintiff:
D. K.
Defendant:
Ocean Springs School District, David Lee Sprowell, Jr. and John Does 1-6
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sanders v. Coleman et al
as 3:2022cv00571
Plaintiff:
David Lee Sanders
Defendant:
Amber Leigh Coleman, M.D.O.C. Parole Board Members, M.D.O.C. Agent Proctor and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Redwine v. Kijakazi
as 3:2022cv00212
Plaintiff:
David Lee Redwine
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Sanders v. M.D.O.C. Parole Board Members et al
as 3:2022cv00534
Plaintiff:
David Lee Sanders
Defendant:
M.D.O.C. Parole Board Members, State of Mississippi and Warren County, Mississippi
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clay v. Kijakazi
as 4:2021cv00149
Plaintiff:
David Lee Clay
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Faulkner v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2020cv00046
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
David Lee Faulkner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Redwine v. Saul
as 3:2020cv00070
Plaintiff:
David Lee Redwine
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
