Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Rowe v. Nevada State Board of Dental Examiners et al
as 2:2022cv01107
Plaintiff:
Michael Rowe
Defendant:
Nevada State Board of Dental Examiners, Hardeep Soll, Rosalie M. Bordelove and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department
as 2:2017cv02095
Defendant:
Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department
Plaintiff:
David Lee Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Frahn v. Phillips et al
as 2:2017cv01560
Defendant:
Charles Brown and David Lee Phillips and Associates
Plaintiff:
David Frahn
702) 385-9081 (fax:
David Lee Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Collins v. People of the State of Nevada Society
as 2:2016cv02470
Plaintiff:
David Lee Collins
Defendant:
People of the State of Nevada Society
Collins v. People of the State of Nevada Society
as 2:2016ms00086
Plaintiff:
David Lee Collins
Defendant:
People of the State of Nevada Society
Hazel v. Colvin
as 3:2016cv00344
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
David Lee Hazel
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00412
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Unknown:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00410
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Mims v. Williams et al
as 2:2015cv02186
Respondent:
Attorney General for the State of Nevada and Brian Williams
Petitioner:
David Lee Mims
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01951
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Unknown:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
