Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Kevin Karsjens, et al v. Jodi Harpstead, et al
as 22-1459
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kevin Scott Karsjens, and all others similarly situated, Kevin John DeVillion, and all others similarly situated, Peter Gerard Lonergan, and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Jodi Harpstead, Kevin Moser, in their individual and official capacities, Peter Puffer and others
David Gamble, et al v. Minnesota State-Operated Svcs, et al
as 21-2626
Plaintiff / Appellant:
David Leroy Gamble, Cyrus Patrick Gladden, II, and all others similarly situated, David James Jannetta, and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Minnesota State-Operated Services, Minnesota State Industries, Minnesota Sex Offender Program and others
Defendant:
Emily Johnson Piper, Shelby Richardson, John and Jane Does, 1-20 as unknown individuals and others
Kevin Scott Karsjens, et al v. Lucinda Jesson, et al
as 15-3485
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Kevin Scott Karsjens, David Leroy Gamble, Kevin John DeVillion and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Lucinda Jesson, Kevin Moser, Peter Puffer and others
Kevin Scott Karsjens, et al v. Lucinda Jesson, et al
as 15-1500
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Kevin Scott Karsjens, David Leroy Gamble, Kevin John DeVillion and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Lucinda Jesson, Dennis Benson, Kevin Moser and others
Karsjens et al v. Minnesota Department of Human Services et al
as 0:2011cv03659
Plaintiff:
Kevin Scott Karsjens , David LeRoy Gamble , Kevin John DeVillion and others
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Human Services, Minnesota Sex Offender Program, Lucinda Jesson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gamble v. Fabian
as 0:2009cv01681
Plaintiff:
David LeRoy Gamble
Defendant:
Joan Fabian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Type:
Prisoner Petitions
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
