Cases 41 - 50 of 81
McClary v. Hopkins
as 3:2016cv00088
Plaintiff:
Ronald McClary
Defendant:
Belquis Hopkins, David Mitchell and Anthony Searles
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Bullard v. Mitchell et al
as 3:2015cv00501
Defendant:
David Mitchell and George Solomon
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Doctor v. NC Department of Public Safety et al
as 3:2015cv00452
Plaintiff:
Obadiah Doctor
Defendant:
NC Department of Public Safety, George T. Solomon, David Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Triplett et al
as 3:2015cv00400
Plaintiff:
William Thomas
Defendant:
FNU Triplett, FNU Russell, FNU Holder and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
McClary v. Solomon et al
as 5:2015ct03219
Plaintiff:
Ronald McClary
Defendant:
George Solomon and David Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marcus Alston v. George Solomon
as 15-6914
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARCUS ALSTON
Defendant - Appellee:
GEORGE T. SOLOMON, DAVID MITCHELL and NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY
American Humanist Association et al v. Frank L. Perry et al
as 5:2015cv00070
Plaintiff:
American Humanist Association and Kwame Jamal Teague
Defendant:
Frank L. Perry, David Guice, George Solomon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
American Humanist Association et al v. Frank L. Perry et al
as 5:2015ct03053
Plaintiff:
American Humanist Association and Kwame Jamal Teague
Defendant:
Frank L. Perry, David Guice, George Solomon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wright v. Mitchell et al
as 3:2015cv00011
Plaintiff:
Lazurus Wright
Defendant:
David Mitchell, Ken Beaver, FNU Parker and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Wynn et al v. Perry et al
as 3:2014cv00625
Plaintiff:
Stacey Wynn , Orlando Harshaw , Sean L. Smith and others
Defendant:
Frank L. Perry, David Mitchell, Lawrence Parsons and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
