Cases 1 - 10 of 16
USA v. Sean Morton
as 22-50211
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
SEAN DAVID MORTON
Sean David Morton v. United States
as 2:2020cv11504
Petitioner:
Sean David Morton
Respondent:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Sean Morton v. USDC-CALA
as 17-73215
:
In re: SEAN DAVID MORTON
Petitioner:
SEAN DAVID MORTON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Real Party In Interest:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Sean Morton
as 17-50351
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
SEAN DAVID MORTON
Sean Morton v. USDC-CALA
as 17-71708
:
In re: SEAN DAVID MORTON
Petitioner:
SEAN DAVID MORTON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Real Party In Interest:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Sean Morton
as 17-50144
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
SEAN DAVID MORTON
Sean David Morton et al v. United States Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv02890
Defendant:
James C. Hughes, Valerie L. Makarewicz, United States Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Melissa Morton and Sean David Morton
Morton's of Chicago, Inc. v. A Morton Brothers Joint Management, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv01043
Defendant:
A Morton Brothers Joint Intellectual Property, LLC, A Morton Brothers Joint Management, LLC, A Morton Brothers Joint, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Morton's of Chicago, Inc.
Unknown:
William D. Raman
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Sean-David Morton v. Sandra Brown et al
as 2:2017cv02403
Defendant:
Sandra Brown, Eileen Decker, James Hughes and others
Plaintiff:
Sean David Morton
Real Party In Interest Defendant:
United States of America
Esgar Ernest Perez v. County of Riverside
as 5:2016cv02360
Defendant:
County of Riverside, Daniel DiMaggio, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Esgar Ernesto Perez
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
