Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Methodist Healthcare System of San Antonio Ltd LLP et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina
as 3:2025cv03145
Plaintiff: Methodist Healthcare System of San Antonio Ltd LLP doing business as Methodist Hospital Northeast doing business as Methodist Hospital doing business as Methodist Hospital Texsan, KPH-Consolidation Inc doing business as HCA Houston Healthcare Kingwood doing business as HCA Houston Healthcare North Cypress, Houston-PPH LLC doing business as HCA Houston Healthcare Medical Center and others
Defendant: Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Columbia Rio Grande Healthcare LP et al v. Anthem Insurance Companies Inc
as 3:2025cv02707
Plaintiff: Columbia Rio Grande Healthcare LP doing business as Rio Grande Regional Hospital, Methodist Healthcare System of San Antonio Ltd LLP doing business as Methodist Hospital Specialty & Transplant, St Davids Healthcare Partnership LP LLP doing business as St. Davids North Austin Medical Center and others
Defendant: Anthem Insurance Companies Inc doing business as Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Indiana doing business as Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Columbia Medical Center of Plano Subsidiary LP et al v. Highmark Inc et al
as 3:2025cv00558
Plaintiff: Columbia Medical Center of Plano Subsidiary LP doing business as Medical City Plano doing business as Medical City Frisco, a Medical Center of Plano Facility, Columbia Hospital at Medical City Dallas Subsidiary LP doing business as Medical City Dallas, Columbia North Hills Hospital Subsidiary LP doing business as Medical City North Hills and others
Defendant: Highmark Inc doing business as Highmark Blue Cross Blue Shield and Highmark Western and Northeastern New York Inc doing business as BlueCross BlueShield of Western New York and BlueShield of Northeastern New York
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
North v. CoreCivic, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv02239
Plaintiff: David North
Defendant: CoreCivic, Inc., Brian Kohen, Pamela Laurer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
North v. CoreCivic, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv02240
Plaintiff: David North
Defendant: CoreCivic, Inc., Brian Kohen, Pamela Laurer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sherwin Brook v. J. McCormley, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-17289
Defendant / Appellee: J. LAWRENCE MCCORMLEY, an Arizona resident and TIFFANY & BOSCO, PA, an Arizona professional corporation
Plaintiff / Appellant: SHERWIN A. BROOK, an Illinois resident, as Trustee of the David North II Trust, successor to the assets of Cortina Financial, Inc.
Toledo v. HCA Holdings, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2019cv03683
Defendant: Rio Grande Regional Hospital, Inc., EASTERN IDAHO HEALTH SERVICES, INC., BAY VIEW REHABILITATION AT MERCY HOSPITAL and others
Interested Party: United States of America
Plaintiff: CLARISSE CHRISTINE TOLEDO
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
North v. Kohen et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv01427
Defendant: Brian Kohen, Laruer, Sweaney and others
Plaintiff: David North
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
North v. Kohen et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv01428
Defendant: Brian Kohen, Richard Sutton Jr, Dr Rivas and others
Plaintiff: David North
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sherwin Brook v. J. McCormley, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-4255
Plaintiff - Appellant: SHERWIN A. BROOK, as Trustee of the David North II Trust, successor to the assets of Cortina Financial, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee: J. LAWRENCE MCCORMLEY and TIFFANY BOSCO, P.A.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?