Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Larson v. Minnesota Sex Offender Program, the et al
as 0:2013cv01074
Plaintiff:
Hollis J. Larson
Defendant:
Minnesota Sex Offender Program, the, Lucinda Jesson, Cal Ludeman and others
LaFountaine v. Reishus et al
as 0:2013cv00355
Plaintiff:
Richard John LaFountaine
Defendant:
Dave Reishus, David Paulson, Stephen Craane and others
Sorenson v. Minnesota Department of Human Services, the et al
as 0:2012cv02990
Plaintiff:
Eric Michael Sorenson
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Human Services, the, Minnesota Sex Offender Program, the, Corrections Medical Services and others
Sorenson v. Minnesota Department of Human Services, the et al
as 0:2012cv01554
Plaintiff:
Eric Michael Sorenson
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Human Services, the, Minnesota Sex Offender Program, the, Lucinda Jesson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boldt v. Paulson et al
as 0:2012cv01500
Plaintiff:
William Joseph Boldt
Defendant:
David Paulson, Nan Larson, John Agrimson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wheatley v. Smith et al
as 0:2012cv00880
Plaintiff:
Prentice Wheatley
Defendant:
Michelle Smith, Stephen Craane, Keith Krueger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goldhammer v. Rose et al
as 0:2011cv00852
Plaintiff:
Philip Goldhammer
Defendant:
Robert Rose , Angie Tobiason , Faith Ferguson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States v. Paulson et al
as 0:2010cv03805
Plaintiff:
United States
Defendant:
David Paulson, Lois Paulson, Kenneth Kludt and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403
Allan v. Ludeman et al
as 0:2010cv00176
Plaintiff:
Peter Allan, Sr
Defendant:
Cal Ludeman, Dennis Benson, Michael Tesneer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wallace v. CMS et al
as 0:2009cv01390
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Octavius Wallace
Defendant:
CMS, David Paulson, Kathy Reid and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Type:
Prisoner Petitions
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
