Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Richards v. Roy et al
as 0:2018cv01201
Plaintiff:
Terry Richards
Defendant:
Tom Roy, Kathryn Halvorson, Nola Karow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wheatley v. Parks et al
as 0:2015cv01979
Plaintiff:
Prentice Wheatley
Defendant:
Mike Parks, John Quist, Kent Grandlienard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bergren v. Minnesota Department of Corrections, The, et al
as 0:2014cv04658
Plaintiff:
Edward Ross Bergren
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Corrections, The, Tom Roy, Nan Larson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sorenson v. Minnesota Department of Human Services et al
as 0:2014cv04193
Plaintiff:
Eric Michael Sorenson
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Human Services, Minnesota Sex Offender Program, Lucinda Jesson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sorenson v. Office of the Minnesota Attorney General et al
as 0:2014cv02929
Plaintiff:
Eric Michael Sorenson
Defendant:
Office of the Minnesota Attorney General, Lori Swanson, Aaron Winters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prentice Wheatley v. Michelle Smith, et al
as 14-2200
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Prentice Wheatley
Defendant - Appellee:
Michelle Smith, Stephen Craane, Keith Krueger and others
v. Wheatley et al
as 0:2014cv00880
Plaintiff:
Prentice Wheatley
Defendant:
Jackson Evans, David Paulson, Nannette Larson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haden v. Hellinger et al
as 9:2014cv00318
Plaintiff:
Robert Haden
Defendant:
Karl Hellinger, Maura Pavlot, Jason Searcy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
de la Garza v Roy et al
as 0:2014cv00088
Plaintiff:
Cesar de la Garza
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, Corizon Inc., Nanette Larson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prentice Wheatley v. Michelle Smith, et al
as 13-3413
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Prentice Wheatley
Defendant - Appellee:
Michelle Smith, Stephen Craane, Keith Krueger and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
