Cases 1 - 10 of 51
In re: Young
as 22-3124
Petitioner:
In re: DONALD C. YOUNG
Respondent:
DAVID R. MCKUNE, Warden, Lansing Correctional Facility, ROGER WERHOLTZ, Secretary of Corrections and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF KANSAS
Coleman v. McKune, et al
as 15-3222
Petitioner - Appellant:
RASHEEM A. COLEMAN
Respondent - Appellee:
DAVID R. MCKUNE, Warden, Lansing Correctional Facility, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF KANSAS and LANSING CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
In re: Coleman, et al
as 15-3170
Petitioner:
RASHEEM A. COLEMAN
Respondent:
DAVID R. MCKUNE, Warden, Lansing Correctional Facility, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF KANSAS and LANSING CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Brown v. McKune, et al
as 15-3048
Petitioner - Appellant:
COREY BROWN
Respondent - Appellee:
DAVID R. MCKUNE and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF KANSAS
Salary v. Cardona, et al
as 14-3170
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK T.J. SALARY
Defendant - Appellee:
ALICIA CARDONA, Psychiatrist, Lansing Correctional Facility, HOWARD ANDERSON, Mental Health Professional, Lansing Correctional Facility, CHERI JAYNES, TRU Program Manager, Lansing Correctional Facility and others
Kingyon v. State of Kansas, et al
as 13-3288
Petitioner - Appellant:
TOMMY KINGYON
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF KANSAS, DAVID R. MCKUNE, Warden, Lansing Correctional Facility and STEVE SIX, Attorney General of the State of Kansas
Johns v. McKune, et al
as 13-3289
Petitioner - Appellant:
NATHANIEL JOHNS
Respondent - Appellee:
DAVID R. MCKUNE, Warden, Lansing Correctional Facility, STATE OF KANSAS and DEREK SCHMIDT, Attorney General of the State of Kansas
Brown v. McKune
as 13-3081
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL BROWN
Respondent - Appellee:
DAVID R. MCKUNE
Smith v. McKune, et al
as 12-3343
Petitioner - Appellant:
VICTOR SMITH
Respondent - Appellee:
DAVID R. MCKUNE, Warden and DEREK SCHMIDT, Kansas Attorney General
Moore v. McKune, et al
as 12-3326
Petitioner - Appellant:
GREGORY MOORE
Respondent - Appellee:
DAVID R. MCKUNE and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF KANSAS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.