Cases 1 - 10 of 10
David Ali v. Nathaniel Quarterman
as 15-40693
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DAVID RASHEED ALI
Defendant - Appellant:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
David Ali v. Nathaniel Quarterman
as 14-41165
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DAVID RASHEED ALI
Defendant - Appellant:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
David Ali v. Nathaniel Quarterman, et al
as 12-40145
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID RASHEED ALI
Defendant - Appellee:
NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN and RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
David Ali v. Michael Maness, et al
as 11-40938
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID RASHEED ALI
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL MANESS, Unit Chaplain, AKBAR SHABAZZ, Regional Islamic Chaplain, MICHAEL RUESTER, Unit Assistant Warden and others
Ali v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2011cv00032
Petitioner:
David Rasheed Ali
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
David Ali v. Nathaniel Quarterman
as 10-41045
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID RASHEED ALI
Defendant - Appellee:
NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN
Ali v. Dewberry et al
as 6:2010cv00454
Plaintiff:
David Rasheed Ali
Defendant:
Dwayne E Dewberry, Brenda K Bailey, Susan Bauer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Ali v. Maness et al
as 9:2009cv00179
Plaintiff:
David Rasheed Ali
Defendant:
Michael Maness, Akbar Shabazz, Michael Ruester and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Ali v. Nathaniel Quarterman, Director
as 09-40612
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID RASHEED ALI
Defendant - Appellee:
NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Ali v. Quarterman
as 9:2009cv00052
Plaintiff:
David Rasheed Ali
Defendant:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
