Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Bucky Dent the Film, Inc. v. David Brown et al
as 2:2023cv02474
Plaintiff:
Bucky Dent the Film, Inc.
Defendant:
David Brown, Julian Brown, Stephanie Brown, - and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
USA v. David Smith
as 22-30188
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID RAYMOND SMITH
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv08422
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
David Andrews v. Craig Koenig
as 21-70226
Respondent:
CRAIG KOENIG, Acting Warden
Petitioner:
DAVID RAYMOND ANDREWS
David Andrews v. B. Martinez, et al
as 19-17087
Defendant / Appellee:
C. HOYT, Correctional Officer, B. MARTINEZ, Correctional Counselor II, A. ANDERSON, Commissioner and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID RAYMOND ANDREWS
Defendant:
C. CHRISTENSEN
Robert DeShetler, Jr., et al v. FCA US LLC, et al
as 19-3012
Defendant / Appellee:
FCA US LLC, INTERNATIONAL UNION UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA and UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA, REGION 2B
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM SHARP, LEAH R. WITHROW, SHAWN MADALINKSI and others
Engel v. Raymond
as 3:2017cv05087
Plaintiff:
Noel J. P. Engel
Defendant:
David Raymond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
In re: David R. Wroblewski, Esq.
as 16-80169
Respondent:
In re: DAVID RAYMOND WROBLEWSKI, Esquire, Admitted to the Bar of the Ninth Circuit: November 7, 2006
David Andrews v. USDC-CASJ
as 12-70769
:
In re: DAVID RAYMOND ANDREWS
Petitioner:
DAVID RAYMOND ANDREWS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE
Real Party In Interest:
J. EVERT, Library Technical Asst., CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RAMONA REICH, Correction Officer and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02003
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
