Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 852
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00545
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
VAINSTEIN v. RICHARDSON et al
as 1:2019cv01028
Plaintiff: EITTAN VAINSTEIN
Defendant: DAVID ROARK, WILLIAM P. BARR, KEVIN MCALEENAN and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01745
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Luis Rodriguez Solorzano v. Kirstjen Nielson, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-50220
Defendant / Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ROBERT COWAN, In His Official Capacity as Director of the National Benefits Center, MARGARET A. HARTNETT, In Her Official Capacity as Director of the El Paso Field Office and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: LUIS ORLANDO RODRIGUEZ SOLORZANO
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-10219
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01085
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv10052
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00141
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv06418
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv04836
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?