Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Rogers v. Robles
as 3:2026cv02422
Plaintiff:
Delbert Glenn Rogers
Defendant:
David Robles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Robles
as 5:2026cv00160
Plaintiff:
Delbert Glenn Rogers
Defendant:
David Robles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
May v. Bowers et al
as 3:2026cv01932
Plaintiff:
Alonzo May
Defendant:
John David Bowers, David Robles, Calvin Brannon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
May v. Bowers et al
as 5:2026cv00125
Plaintiff:
Alonzo May
Defendant:
John David Bowers, David Robles, Calvin Brannon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robles v. Nelson et al
as 6:2024cv01402
Defendant:
Curtis Peler, Mike Highsmith and Shane Newmon Nelson
Plaintiff:
David Robles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perry v. Robles et al
as 1:2023cv07696
Plaintiff:
Kahreem Perry
Defendant:
David Robles and Yvette Agosto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perry v. Robles et al
as 1:2023cv07492
Plaintiff:
Kahreem Perry
Defendant:
David Robles and Ivette Agosto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robles et al v. (PSRB) Appt Governor Psychiatric Security Review Board of Oregon Members
as 6:2023cv00975
Plaintiff:
David Robles and Guilty Except for Insanity (GEI) Population of Oregon
Defendant:
(PSRB) Appt Governor Psychiatric Security Review Board of Oregon Members
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robles v. OSH Junction City et al
as 6:2023cv00922
Plaintiff:
David Robles
Defendant:
OSH Junction City, Forest Ty Team and Blake Preston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robles v. Psychiatrict Security Review Board
as 6:2023cv00934
Plaintiff:
David Robles
Defendant:
Psychiatrict Security Review Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
