Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Perry v. Robles et al
as 1:2023cv07696
Plaintiff:
Kahreem Perry
Defendant:
David Robles and Yvette Agosto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perry v. Robles et al
as 1:2023cv07492
Plaintiff:
Kahreem Perry
Defendant:
David Robles and Ivette Agosto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robles et al v. (PSRB) Appt Governor Psychiatric Security Review Board of Oregon Members
as 6:2023cv00975
Plaintiff:
David Robles and Guilty Except for Insanity (GEI) Population of Oregon
Defendant:
(PSRB) Appt Governor Psychiatric Security Review Board of Oregon Members
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robles v. Psychiatrict Security Review Board
as 6:2023cv00934
Plaintiff:
David Robles
Defendant:
Psychiatrict Security Review Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robles v. OSH Junction City et al
as 6:2023cv00922
Plaintiff:
David Robles
Defendant:
OSH Junction City, Forest Ty Team and Blake Preston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robles v. Junction City, Oregon State Hospital
as 6:2023cv00933
Plaintiff:
David Robles
Defendant:
Junction City, Oregon State Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roble v. Oregon State Hospital
as 6:2023cv00762
Petitioner:
David Roble
Respondent:
Oregon State Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
(PC) Ward v. Raygoza et al
as 1:2021cv00903
Defendant:
Euchana Nwaka, Christine Raygoza, Angelica Hernandez and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald William Ward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00904
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00903
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
