Cases 1 - 9 of 9
ROWE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv50538
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID ROWE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROWE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv07184
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID ROWE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROWE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv60064
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID ROWE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Banfield et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11346
Plaintiff:
Walter Jensen, Jose M. Burgos, Robert Toscano and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Sr., Christopher Bonin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Rowe et al v. Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd et al
as 1:2012cv22621
Plaintiff:
Marjorie Rowe and David Rowe, Jr.
Defendant:
Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd and Celebrity Cruises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROWE et al v. SUTTON
as 3:2009cv05940
Plaintiff:
DEBRA ROWE and DAVID ROWE
Defendant:
JEREMY SUTTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Goldbourne, et al v. Johnson, et al
as 08-60773
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SPENCER BROWN, ARLENE BROWN, FLORENCE CLARKE and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CURTIZE D JOHNSON and GREY HOUND BUS CO, doing business as Greyhound Lines, Inc.
Goldbourne, et al v. Johnson, et al
as 08-60651
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SPENCER BROWN, ARLENE BROWN, FLORENCE CLARKE and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CURTIZE D JOHNSON and GREY HOUND BUS CO, doing business as Greyhound Lines, Inc.
Goldbourne et al v. Johnson et al
as 2:2008cv00004
Plaintiff:
Odette Bernard Goldbourne, Bryan Goldbourne, Spencer Brown and others
Defendant:
Curtize D. Johnson and Grey Hound Bus Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
