Cases 1 - 10 of 10
STARKS et al v. CHUHAK & TECSON, P.C et al
as 0:2017cv62368
Plaintiff:
Duane Starks , Jevon Kearse , Laveranues Coles and others
Defendant:
Chuhak & Tecson, P.C., Gary J. Stern, David Shiner and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
STARKS et al v. CHUHAK & TECSON, P.C et al
as 0:2017cv62367
Plaintiff:
Duane Starks , Jevon Kearse , Laveranues Coles and others
Defendant:
Chuhak & Tecson, P.C., Gary J. Stern, David Shiner and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Starks et al v. Chuhak & Tecson, P.C et al
as 0:2017cv62366
Plaintiff:
Duane Starks , Jevon Kearse , Laveranues Coles and others
Defendant:
Chuhak & Tecson, P.C. , Gary J. Stern, David Shiner and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Shiner v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 5:2017cv00471
Petitioner:
Marc David Shiner
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
In re: Marc Shiner
as 17-13287
Petitioner:
In re: MARC DAVID SHINER
Successive Habeas Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Rauxa Direct, LLC v. Winthrop & Weinstine, P.A. et al
as 1:2015cv04964
Defendant:
Winthrop & Weinstine, P.A. , Norman Jones , Gary J. Stern and others
Plaintiff:
Rauxa Direct, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rojsza et al v. Ferndale et al
as 2:2013cv01468
Plaintiff:
Artur Rojsza , Margaret Rojsza and Norbert Rojsza
Defendant:
City of Ferndale , Gary Jensen , Matthew Huffman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marc Shiner v. USA
as 12-16383
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARC DAVID SHINER
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Rojsza et al v. Ferndale et al
as 2:2012cv02152
Plaintiff:
Artur Rojsza and Margaret Rojsza
Defendant:
City of Ferndale, Gary Jensen, Michael Knapp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shiner v. United States of America
as 9:2012cv80888
Plaintiff:
Marc David Shiner
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
