Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Western Pennsylvania Teamsters and Employers Pensi, et al v. Pacira Biosciences Inc, et al
as 26-1500
Plaintiff:
WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA TEAMSTERS AND EMPLOYERS PENSION FUND and LEANDRO ALVAREZ, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated
Defendant:
PACIRA BIOSCIENCES INC, DAVID STACK, FRANK D. LEE and others
YOUNG v. LEE et al
as 2:2025cv11841
Plaintiff:
THOMAS YOUNG
Defendant:
FRANK D. LEE, DAVID STACK, ANTHONY MOLLOY, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
ALVAREZ v. PACIRA BIOSCIENCES, INC. et al
as 2:2025cv00322
Plaintiff:
LEANDRO ALVAREZ
Defendant:
ANTHONY MOLLOY, PACIRA BIOSCIENCES, INC., DAVID STACK and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Stack v. New York City et al
as 1:2023cv07018
Plaintiff:
David Stack
Defendant:
New York City and New York Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GARY SCHADER v. THERO et al
as 3:2022cv02017
Plaintiff:
Gary Schader, Derivatively on Behalf of Nominal Defendant Amarin Corporation PLC and GARY SCHADER
Defendant:
John F. Thero, Michael W. Kalb, Lars G. Ekman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Walker v. Chiasma, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01056
Plaintiff:
Matthew Walker
Defendant:
Chiasma, Inc., Scott Minick, John F. Thero and others
Jenkins v. Chiasma, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv06128
Plaintiff:
Shannon Jenkins
Defendant:
Chiasma, Inc., Scott Minick, John F. Thero and others
WATERMAN v. CHIASMA, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv03127
Plaintiff:
MARC WATERMAN
Defendant:
CHIASMA, INC., DAVID STACK, RAJ KANNAN and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Raul v. Chiasma, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv05693
Defendant:
Todd Foley, David Stack, John F. Thero and others
Plaintiff:
Pinchas Raul
Marshall v. Chiasma, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv05651
Plaintiff:
Michael Marshall
Defendant:
Todd Foley, David Stack, John F. Thero and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
