Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Steiner et al v. eBay Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv11181
Plaintiff:
Ina Steiner, David Steiner and Steiner Associates, LLC
Defendant:
eBay Inc., Progressive F.O.R.C.E. Concepts, LLC, Devin Wenig and others
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Racketeering (RICO) Act
USA v. Thomas Steiner
as 14-4628
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
THOMAS DAVID STEINER
Government Employees Insurance Co. et al v. Ramkumar Panhani, M.D. et al
as 1:2014cv01437
Defendant:
David Steiner, M.D., Modesto Fontanez, Iqbal Merchant, M.D. and others
Plaintiff:
Geico Casualty Co., Geico General Insurance Company,, Geico Indemnity Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Paidi v. Mill
as 10-4397
Plaintiff:
Lakshman Rao Paidi and Alanna Farrell
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Venkat Rao Dandamudi, Naveen Parupalli, Sunitha Talluri and others
Defendant:
Richard P. Mills, Commissioner of Education, New York State Department of Education, Robert M. Bennett, Chancellor of the New York State Board of Regents and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Merryl H. Tisch, Chancellor of the New York State Board of Regents and David Steiner, Commissioner of Education
Akula et al v. Steiner et al
as 1:2010cv04549
Plaintiff:
Vishnu Akula , Balaji Duddukuru , Murali Kothuri and others
Defendant:
David Steiner , New York State Department of Education , Merryl H. Tisch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Paidi et al v. Mills et al
as 1:2008cv06932
Plaintiff:
Venkat Rao Dandamudi , Naveen Parupalli , Sunitha Talluri and others
Defendant:
New York State Department of Education , New York State Board of Regents , Merryl H. Tisch and others
Consolidated_plaintiff:
Vishnu Akula , Balaji Duddukuru , Murali Kothuri and others
Consolidated_defendant:
New York State Board of Regents
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
