Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Shah v. Schulman et al
as 1:2022cv01445
Plaintiff:
Alpesh Shah
Defendant:
Daniel H. Schulman, John D. Rainey, Rodney C. Adkins and others
Nominal Defendant:
PayPal Holdings, Inc.
Lalor v. Schulman et al
as 3:2022cv00370
Plaintiff:
Robert Lalor
Defendant:
Daniel H. Schulman, John D. Rainey, Rodney C. Adkins and others
Pang v. PayPal Holdings, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv09720
Plaintiff:
Shang Pang
Defendant:
PayPal Holdings, Inc., Daniel H Schulman, John D. Rainey and others
Lovoi v. Aguirre et al
as 1:2020cv00024
Defendant:
CVS Health Corporation, Fernando Aguirre, Mark T. Bertolini and others
Plaintiff:
Gerald Joseph Lovoi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Waterford Township Police & Fire Retirement System v. CVS Health Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv00434
Defendant:
Mark T Bertolino, Olympia J Snowe, Tony L. White and others
Plaintiff:
Waterford Township Police & Fire Retirement System
Iron Workers Local No. 25 Pension Fund v. Donahoe et al
as 5:2017cv05741
Plaintiff:
Iron Workers Local No. 25 Pension Fund
Defendant:
John J. Donahoe, Gail J. McGovern, David M. Moffett and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Banchalter v. Merlo et al
as 1:2017cv00425
Defendant:
Larry J Merlo , David M Denton , David W. Dorman and others
Plaintiff:
Alan Banchalter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Feghali v. CVS Health Corporation et al
as 1:2017cv00399
Plaintiff:
Elie Feghali
Defendant:
CVS Health Corporation, Larry J. Merlo, David M. Denton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sherman v. CVS Health Corporation et al
as 1:2017cv00378
Plaintiff:
Alison Sherman
Defendant:
CVS Health Corporation, David W. Dorman, Richard J. Swift and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Seeman v. Schulman et al
as 5:2017cv02206
Plaintiff:
Michael Seeman
Defendant:
Brian Schulman , John D. Rainey , Patrick L.A. Dupuis and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
